text is null
Parameter name: text
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Lawyer: Toulouse suspect said he "did nothing"
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
(CBS/AP) PARIS - A lawyer said she has evidence that the man accused of killing seven people in attacks in southwestern France claimed his innocence to police.
Mohamed Merah was killed after a more than 30-hour standoff with authorities, who have said he confessed to the killing spree and refused to surrender peacefully.
But a lawyer for Merah's father now says that she has two videos of the 23-year-old saying he "did nothing."
Zahia Mokhtari described the videos to BFM television but would not detail how she got them.
Gunman behind France terror attacks buried
Al-Jazeera opts to not air France attack video
France files charges against gunman's brother
Police say Merah filmed himself killing seven people in a spate of attacks in early March. The dead included three Jewish schoolchildren, a rabbi and three paratroopers.
Merah, who espoused radical Islam and said he had links to al Qaeda, was shot in the head after a standoff with police last week in the southern city of Toulouse.
Merah's father has asked Mokhtari to file a lawsuit against the elite police force, RAID, that killed his son.
A police official said Monday that Merah had given police evidence that proved he was the perpetrator. He spoke on condition of anonymity, citing policy.
Monday, April 2, 2012
Lawyer Donna Hall appears before court
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Prominent Maori lawyer Donna Hall has denied a conflict of interest over a central North Island land deal in which she allegedly acted for three of the trusts involved in the sale.
The Law Society's standards committee alleges Ms Hall acted for the vendor, purchaser and lender during the 2007 deal, without the consent of each party to represent the others.
The committee opened its case against Ms Hall before the Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal in Wellington today.
The tribunal is able to impose much harsher sanctions than the committee can, including being struck off the roll, suspension, or fines of up to $30,000.
The hearing follows a complaint from a shareholder of the Tauhara Middle 15 Trust, which in 2007 bought the Tauhara North block near Taupo from Landcorp for $5 million jointly with another trust.
The complainant alleged a conflict because Ms Hall acted for both Tauhara and the Hikuwai Hapu Lands Trust, which facilitated the transaction.
She also acted for Tauhara Middle 4A2A Trust, which provided an unsecured loan to Tauhara Middle 15 to help fund its $1m contribution to the deal.
Law Society standards committee lawyer Gary Turkington told the tribunal today that Ms Hall failed to advise each party of the areas of conflict or potential conflict, and to advise the purchaser and lender that each should take independent advice.
Ms Hall was in a conflicted position during the on-selling of the land because she was also acting for the purchasing trust, he said.
In authorising the sale, the Maori Land Court gave its approval for the execution of a mortgage, but signalled it was not approving the purchase until five questions had been answered.
Mr Turkington said Ms Hall by-passed the questions and had put Hikuwai's trustees first.
Ms Hall's lawyer, Helen Cull, said there was no conflict because her client was not acting on the land deal itself.
Rather, she was acting on behalf of the Tauhara Middle 15 in its Maori Land Court proceedings, and to help remove a trustee who was opposed to the bank loan to secure the deal.
Ms Cull said the trust had approached Ms Hall to act on its behalf in the land deal, but she declined and instructed a barrister to act for the trust.
It was the barrister's duty to inform the trustees of a potential conflict, and any conflict arose from the trusts sharing trustees, she said.
Three people involved in the deal were trustees on all three trusts, while a further three were trustees on the two Tauhara trusts.
Ms Cull said there was evidence the trusts had shared mutual interests in purchasing the land, which had significant development potential for Maori, and the trusts shared beneficiaries.
"It is only a professional conflict if there are two distinctive interests that are conflicting and we don't accept that,'' she said.
Tribunal member Susan Hughes QC questioned whether the trustees were aware that Ms Hall stood to lose $300,000 in legal fees from the Hikuwai trust if the deal did not got through.
Ms Cull said she would need to take instructions from her client on that matter, and would get back to the tribunal tomorrow.
The hearing is expected to last three days.
- APNZ
By Hana Garrett-Walker and Matthew Backhouse | Email HanaAlabama traffic tickets may help fund spinal cord injury research - JD Supra (press release)
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Have you heard the saying "Make lemons out of lemonade?" It's about getting something potentially positive out of a negative situation. There's no doubt that speeding and reckless driving are negative situations in Alabama. Irresponsible driving leads to car accidents and serious injuries all too often.
Some of the most serious of injuries that a car accident victim can sustain are brain or spinal cord injuries. A legislative proposal in Alabama aims to find a cure and more effective treatment for spinal cord injuries. The money that's needed to research such injury treatments would be raised partly through traffic tickets.
The Birmingham News reports that a bill has passed through the Alabama Senate that would add on some extra cost to Alabama traffic tickets. A speeding ticket, for example, would cost an offender an extra $1; a reckless driving ticket would cost an extra $5; a DUI citation would cost an extra $10. The extra money that would be raised due to drivers' unsafe behaviors would serve as means to treat the catastrophic consequences that often result from such behaviors.
A spinal cord injury severely changes a person's life and the life of their friends and family. While stopping irresponsible driving and, therefore, preventing catastrophic accidents from happening would be the ideal circumstance, the next best circumstance is finding better ways to treat or even cure a spinal cord injury.
The bill is called the T.J. Atchison Spinal Cord Injury Act because it was inspired by a car accident victim from Alabama who was paralyzed in a 2010 wreck. If passed, the bill would help people like him gain more hope that their injuries could improve one day.
Source: The Birmingham News, "Bill in Alabama Legislature would bring spinal cord research money to UAB," Hannah Wolfson, March 28, 2012
Posted in Brain Injury & Spinal Cord Injury
AP Source: NFLPA hires lawyer for Saints bounties - Fox News
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Published April 01, 2012Associated Press
AppId is over the quota
Published April 01, 2012Associated Press
The NFL Players Association told players involved in the New Orleans Saints' bounty case that there is a chance they could face criminal charges and it hired outside counsel to represent them if needed.
While Commissioner Roger Goodell weighs how to punish the two dozen or so players the league says might be connected to the bounties, the NFLPA also suggested that players have a lawyer and union representative present when they are interviewed by NFL investigators.
The union plans to head to New York this week to meet with league security staff and review additional evidence, taking up the NFL on an offer it made more than once.
The latest steps were described to The Associated Press on Sunday by two people familiar with the case. They spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing.
The NFL has said that 22 to 27 defensive players were part of the Saints' pay-for-pain bounty pool, which awarded thousands of dollars of cash bonuses from 2009-11 for vicious hits that knocked targeted opponents out of games. One example, according to the league: Linebacker Jonathan Vilma offered $10,000 to any New Orleans player who sidelined Minnesota Vikings quarterback Brett Favre during the 2010 NFC championship game.
On March 21, Goodell suspended Saints coach Sean Payton for all of next season, general manager Mickey Loomis for eight games, assistant coach Joe Vitt for six games, and former defensive coordinator Gregg Williams for at least one season. Goodell also fined the Saints $500,000 and took away two second-round draft picks.
The appeals process is expected to begin this week.
When those punishments were announced, Goodell said he would wait for NFLPA input before determining how to discipline players who participated in the bounties.
"While I will not address player conduct at this time, I am profoundly troubled by the fact that players — including leaders among the defensive players — embraced this program so enthusiastically and participated with what appears to have been a deliberate lack of concern for the well-being of their fellow players," Goodell said.
The NFL has asked the union for contact information for players. The NFLPA, meanwhile, was told by the league it could try to speak to Payton, Loomis, Vitt and Williams.
The league has not given any timetable for when Goodell will decide on penalties for the players, creating uncertainty for the Saints — as well as other teams who might now have any of the players involved.
Gabe Feldman, a law professor and director of the Tulane Sports Law Program, said shortly after the NFL made its investigation public that he didn't expect any criminal or civil legal action specifically tied to the bounties.
"They're difficult cases to bring, because it's hard to prove the injury was caused by a tackle with specific intent to injure, rather than a regular tackle," Feldman explained at the time. "We all know injuries are a part of football. There can't be legal liability anytime there is an injury. Otherwise, you can't have football."
Lawyer: French attacks suspect claimed innocence - The Associated Press
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Lawyer: French attacks suspect claimed innocenceBy SARAH DiLORENZO, Associated Press – 8 hours ago?
AppId is over the quota
Lawyer: French attacks suspect claimed innocenceBy SARAH DiLORENZO, Associated Press – 8 hours ago?
PARIS (AP) — An Algerian lawyer said Monday that she has evidence the young man accused of killing seven people in attacks on French soldiers and a Jewish school claimed his innocence to police. Separately, France announced it was expelling several foreign Islamist extremists on its soil.
Mohamed Merah, 23, was killed after a more than 30-hour standoff with police at his apartment in Toulouse after being identified as the suspect behind the killing spree last month. Authorities have said that during negotiations Merah claimed to have links to al-Qaida and confessed to the killings.
But Zahia Mokhtari, a lawyer for Merah's Algerian father, told BFM television on Monday that she had two identical videos of Merah that contradict the police narrative. "In these videos, he says, 'I am innocent. Why are you killing me? I didn't do anything,'" she said.
Mokhtari would not detail how she got the videos, saying she would reveal more on their origin once she files a lawsuit in French courts against the elite police force, RAID, that killed Merah.
Merah is alleged to have killed three paratroopers, a rabbi and three Jewish schoolchildren, attacks that put French authorities on edge. President Nicolas Sarkozy vowed a crackdown on foreign Islamist radicals, and the Interior Ministry said Monday that deportations are in progress.
An Algerian Islamist radical convicted for a role in 1994 attacks in Marrakech and said to have recently started linking up again with extremists was deported Monday along with an imam from Mali who preached anti-Semitism and the rejection of the West, the Interior Ministry said.
A Saudi imam who has systematically preached the need to isolate women among other things is to be forced home imminently. Efforts to deport two other people are in progress and more such actions can be expected "shortly," the statement said.
A police official with knowledge of the investigation into the Merah case cast doubt on the Algerian lawyer's claims about the videos Monday, noting that Merah led police to evidence that proved he was the perpetrator.
Prosecutors say Merah spoke at length with negotiators from the RAID force throughout the standoff while he was holed up in a Toulouse apartment.
During these conversations, authorities say, Merah told them where to find a video he took of the crime spree. Al-Jazeera television has said it received a copy of the video, which shows the deaths of three paratroopers, three Jewish children and a rabbi from the killer's point of view.
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of police rules, added that Merah had toyed with police during the standoff, initially agreeing to surrender but later vowing to "die with his weapons in his hands."
Police have said that Merah said he had links to al-Qaida but have cast doubt on that claim. They are holding his brother on suspicion he helped to prepare the attacks and are looking for a possible third man who may also have been involved.
The killings have left France reeling, reviving worries about Islamist extremism and shaking up the French presidential campaign.
Associated Press writer Jamey Keaten contributed to this report.
Copyright ? 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.Mali: Lawyers demand return to democracy - The Nation Newspaper
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
The world was jolted with the news of a military putsch in the Republic of Mali when everyone thought Africa was gradually overcoming the negative consequences of military regimes. The development has been roundly condemned. Sanctions have been imposed by some international bodies and countries. Lawyers, in this report by Adebisi Onanuga, Eric Ikhilae and Joseph Jibueze, deplore the coup, suggesting a combination of measures to dislodge the coupists.
The growing acceptance of democracy in the continent in recent years had ignited the belief that Africa had overcome the culture of unconstitutional regime change. Many had thought the continent, smarting from the negative impact of past coup d’états, had begun a gradual trudge toward political stability, until the unexpected happened on March 21 in the Republic of Mali.
Although the coupists in Mali have blamed their action on the alleged failure of the civilian government to effectively arm the soldiers to dislodge the rampaging Tuareg rebels in the Northern part of the country, and pledged a return to civil governance, their action has been totally condemned on the ground that it is unjustifiable and ill-timed.?
Observers argued that as against the case in the Republic of Niger in 2010 when the then incumbent, Mamadou Tandja, attempted to manipulate the constitution to enable him remain in office, the deposed Malian leader, Amadou Toumani Toure, had indicated his intention to vacate office at the end of his tenure. To that end, a presidential election was scheduled for April.
The case of the Mali’s military regime led by 39-year-old Captain Amadou Sanogo is also not helped by the perception of Toure as a “soldier of democracy,” who took power in 1991 through a coup, but handed over to civilians and retreated from public life. He only returned to power through an election in 2002 and was re-elected in 2007.
The outrage over what many have described as the misadventure in Mali stemmed from the fact that the West African sub-region has been affected negatively from past incursions into civil governance by the military. It is safely argued that decades of military rule in West Africa, from the first coup in Togo in 1963 to the last in Niger in 2010, have eroded the foundation of stable democratic governance laid at independence, and instituted arbitrariness, mediocrity and graft; vices that have impaired socio-economic and political development in the sub-region.?
As expected, international bodies have taken steps beyond condemnation, to imposing sanctions on the military adventurists in Mali, beginning with the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). Also, the African Union (AU) has temporarily suspended Mali, while the European Union and Canada have frozen aid and the United States has threatened to follow suit.
Observers are of the view that should these international bodies and foreign powers stop at mere imposition of sanctions, the coupists in Mali may remain in power longer than expected. They suggested that ECOWAS and AU must accept nothing short of their outright dislodgment from power.
In this regard, the belief is that both bodies must go beyond sanction and activate existing mechanisms to counter unconstitutional change of government anywhere on the continent.?
Lawyers, who examined the development, attributed it partly to the growing discontent among the populace and insecurity in the sub-region, resulting from the increasing failure of political leaders to ensure transparency, equity and justice in the allocation of resources.
To them, the coup in Mali may signpost a return to military era in the sub-region should the prevailing inequality and disrespect for the rule of law and democratic ethics persist. They suggested multiple approaches to ensuring immediate end to the political crisis occasioned by the coup in Mali.
Human rights lawyers Femi Falana, Bamidele Aturu, Ike Ofuokwu, Adetokunbo Mumuni, Abubakar Jimoh, Jonathan Iyieke and Theophilus Akanwa condemned the coup and suggested the deployment of combined efforts to restore civil governance in Mali.
They advocated a combination of measures such as legal means via court process; civil disobedience and systematic ostracising of members of the junta and their family members by the international communities.
Falana argued that the coup in Mali is condemnable because it is unwarranted and uncalled for. He wondered why the military decided to strike now when elections were due to hold in April.?
“Why for heaven`s sake did they change the government? And their justification is very irresponsible. If it is about dislodging the Tuareg menace in the northern part of Mali, why didn’t the armed forces sit down with the president and discuss the solution. How can that be a justification for removing an elected government from office?” he asked.?
The former President of the West African Bar Association (WABA) Mr Femi Falana urged ECOWAS to impose comprehensive economic sanctions on Mali, saying such measure would force the army out of power in three months.
“ECOWAS has started well by suspending Mali from its ranks. We now have to proceed to impose comprehensive economic sanction on the country. The officials of the regime have to be targeted by having travel ban imposed on them. ECOWAS should also proceed to consider a military option and that has to be done before these guys settle down. Luckily the people of Mali are up in arms against this government. They are already on the streets protesting against the regime. They need international solidarity to chase out these power hungry and corrupt military adventurers. ?
“The guys cannot operate if ECOWAS and the AU are prepared to teach them a lesson like this for rude interruption of the democratic process of Mali. It is particularly painful because Mali is largely one of the most stable countries in the region. It has an impressive human rights record, for which reasons, those who have grievances can always air them through due process,” he said.
Falana warned that should the coupists be allowed to settle down and impose their misrule on Malians, other military adventurers in other West African countries may want to take a cue from them.
?“That is why the condemnation of the coup by the African Union, the ECOWAS and each of the individual countries in West Africa must be total. But we must now go beyond that. We shouldn`t wait for France or United States to move in and impose their own agents on the people of Mali under the pretext of protecting democracy. ?
“It is supposed to be the West African sub-region, which has had a good record in terms of restoring democracy with the intervention of the ECOMOG in Liberia and Sierra Leone; that should do this. It should be possible for them to dislodge them.
“The West African Bar Association (WABA) has filed a case in the ECOWAS Court challenging the legality of the government because we have passed the era where courts, the municipal courts used to quote that where a coup had succeeded, it acquires its own legitimacy.?
“If we get a judicial pronouncement on the illegality of the government, it becomes a platform for mounting further pressure on them to vacate office. And, of course, nobody wants to deal with an illegitimate government. ?
“On the part of the human right community in Nigeria, we are organizing a protest in Abuja next week at the embassy of Mali to register our dissatisfaction, disaffection with this primitive change of government. I am already in touch with our other colleagues in the human right group and other civil societies in West Africa,” Falana said.?
Aturu commended ECOWAS for its efforts so far, but wondered if the imposed sanctions were capable of compelling the coupists to have a change of mind. He advocated a change of attitude on the part of the continent’s political leaders.
“For me, for us to make a point to the Malian putschists, that what they have done is unwelcome, we need to do everything possible to prevent any external help getting to them. ?We need to, in conjunction with other parts of the world, ensure that no member of their family and official is allowed to travel out of Mali until there is genuine restoration of the rule of law and democracy.?
?“But, of course, we must apply sanctions that would not hurt the people of Mali. That is a big challenge to ECOWAS countries, because if they do economic blockade, they must do it in such a way that humanitarian aids and assistance would get to the people. The emphasis should be on targeting the putschists and their family members. But, as I said, the best way to discourage this kind of thing is for us to do what is right in our country.
“The people of Mali must not just put all their hopes in ECOWAS. They must not put all their hope on the imperialist powers because if these people find that that the Malian putschists are going to dance to their tunes and they are going to have economic benefits, before you know it, they would leave the Malians in the lurch as it were.?
“So what the Malians must do is to organise. It is basically a fight they must win on their feet. I must say that they must do everything possible to defy the military putschists and ensure that they have no option but to restore normalcy and democracy in that country.?
“Of course, they can do with some support of individuals and countries in Africa who are willing to lend a hand in this trying moment of the people of Mali. But I think that ultimately, the battle is theirs. If we have that kind of putschists in Nigeria, it is the people of Nigeria that would fight and not Americans because, in the foreign relation that we know, everybody is looking at his or her own interest.?
“If they see that people who planned the coup are going to make things easier for them in terms of economic trade and bilateral relations, they would easily just abandon the people. So, I think we need to emphasise this point that the people of Mali must take their own destiny in their hands, with the support of genuine friends at the international level.
“We must still do what I call the necessary analysis to see whether the African political elite are not the cause of the nonsensical thing that we are seeing in Mali. I am saying this, not in justification of the coup, but I am saying this in the sense that we must understand, categorically, why the coup took place and what our people need to do to guard against coup d` etat in Africa.?
“We cannot guard against coup d’état if the resources that belong to the people of Africa are being used by a tiny minute proportion of Africa. There is no way this kind of attitude, undemocratic, unconstitutional means of taking power will not take place.?
“So, nobody should be deceived that what took place in Mali is likely to be an isolated case. In other words, what I am trying to say is that to stop coup in Africa, it is left for the civil society and those who believe in the democratic process, to continue to insist that the due process of law must be followed in all cases and to ensure that something that belongs to Africa is used in Africa for Africans.?
“This is because what you find is that a huge proportion of funds are taken out of this continent and kept in foreign bank accounts in Europe and America. And then, you are saying that this type of thing should not take place. It is a joke,” Aturu said.
Jimoh noted that the position of the junta is quite contradictory. ?He observed that while the group claimed to assume power to dislodge the insurgency in the north of the country, it is now seeking international assistance to deal with the insurgency.
Wondering what their actual motive was aside the urge to help themselves to state resources as has been the case in every military intervention, Jimoh said the coupists in Mali should not be given a breathing space by the AU and ECOWAS.
“ECOWAS should not help them until they restore the civilian government that they overthrew and comply with the ultimatum given by the sub-regional body. A full economic blockade should be imposed and all Malian borders with other countries should be closed. It is high time people realised that the era of military intervention in politics is no longer fashionable,” Jimoh said.
Activist-lawyer Ofuokwu said the development in Mali is worrisome and a very sad one which should never have taken place at all.?
He said: “It’s a brutal rape on constitutionality and the rule of law. Military coup is anachronistic and barbaric and should not be condoned in any civilised clime. But we should not look at this affront in isolation because the political class in this part of the continent, that is the West African sub-region, has in no small measure contributed to this very endemic and shameful situation by their disdain and disregard for the rule of law through their inordinate desires to fraudulently come to and cling to power at all cost; through dubious democratic process and using the power of incumbency to thwart the democratic will of the people. All these instances on their own are equally tantamount to a civilian coup d’etat.?
“The rule of law and democracy are all about the rule of the majority and not the political/elite class. Not minding the propaganda of the political class, the feedback we are getting from Mali indicates that the Malian people happily welcomed and received the change. This in itself is a pointer to the fact that the will of the people through the ballot process was not respected.
“The sanctions are a product of instigations and a gang-up by politicians mostly from other countries in the sub-region to protect their corrupt leadership and to maintain their evil status quo, as they are not in any way different from their counterparts in Mali, to avoid a tsunamiic effect of the coup. As it is, ordinary Malians are the ones to suffer the sanctions.
“The only way to prevent the spread is to desist from the use of incumbency factor in suppressing the free choice of the people and for the political class themselves to respect and promote the rule of law and to, forthwith, stop the entrenchment of corruption as a cardinal aspect of political leadership; to drop the swagger of rulership and to exhibit qualities of leadership.?
“By so doing they can make life better for the people they claim to lead. If these are not done, I regret to say that a political cancer has come to stay in the region.”
Executive Director, Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, Mr Adetokunbo Mumuni, said the coup in Mali is a fundamental set back to democracy in the West African sub-region.
His words: “Military regime anywhere is definitely contra-rule of law by virtue of the manner of its emergence. There are provisions of ECOWAS protocol on democracy and good governance to which most countries in the ECOWAS family including Mali are signatories.
“A very important component of the protocol forbids the taking over of governance in any ECOWAS country except according to democratic principles, rule of law, constitutionalism and due process.?
“My sincere opinion is that the leading nations in West Africa - Nigeria, Ghana, Cote D’Ivoire - must rally the international community to put pressure on the new regime in Mali before it settles down and consolidates its hold on power.?
“It is the promptitude and decisiveness with which the current situation in Mali is dealt with that will prevent the festering of the coup culture and propensity in West Africa and by extension the whole of Africa.?
“It is however my further submission that the sanctions to be imposed must be targeted at the leading lights of the military junta and their collaborators within Mali, so that the ordinary people in Mali are not subjected to suffering.”
Constitutional lawyer Jonathan Iyieke is of the view that military incursion in politics whether in Mali or any other democratic state is not only an aberration but an anathema.?
He said: “All over the world, the choice of the people is to elect their leaders in a democratic setting. Anywhere, anytime where it is alleged that the government is impository, unprecedental and draconial as in the military, such government should be sanctioned with immediate effect.?
“It is my opinion that the coup juntas should be penalised for truncating an otherwise, peaceful co-existence of the governed. I further recommend that the law in municipal, regional and internal sphere should provide death penalty for the planners,” he said.
Lagos-based lawyer Theophilus Akanwa described the Mali coup as totally condemnable and unacceptable.?
He said: “I recommend stiffer sanctions that will subdue those who took over power without the mandate of the people. It is, however, a very big lesson for those in power to realise that they are only servants of the people. They are touchable and can be removed, even killed by these heartless men.?
“Those in government should always strive to deliver good governace to the people. They should not see government as a do-or-die thing or their personal right thereby trying to remain in power for life without anything to show for it,” Akanwa said.
Pflugrad, O'Day lawyer up after firings at UM - Billings Gazette
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
MISSOULA — Why? Why were University of Montana Grizzlies football coach Robin Pflugrad and athletic director Jim O’Day fired?
One of the most frustrating things about UM President Royce Engstrom’s actions Thursday was that he gave no reason.
No surprise there, said attorney Dylan McFarland of Milodragovich, Dale, Steinbrenner & Nygren.
When any corporation or large organization such as a university fires a prominent person, “the fact is that the corporation or the company doesn’t want to be tried in the court of public opinion,” said McFarland, who was a standout UM offensive lineman and was drafted by the Buffalo Bills in 2004.
“There’s certainly a potential for legal ramifications and they’re just trying to protect themselves,” he said.
Pflugrad and O’Day already have lawyered up. Pflugrad met Thursday, the day he was fired, with Milt Datsopoulos of Datsopoulos, MacDonald and Lind, the firm that has represented several UM football players accused of running afoul of the law in recent years. The two also are longtime personal friends, Datsopoulos said Friday.
“The approach that the university used to dismiss or relieve these two gentlemen of their positions has created great ambiguity and rumors,” he said.
O’Day has hired the Billings law firm of Edwards, Frickle and Culver. Cliff Edwards won a $240,000 settlement for former Montana State University football coach Mike Kramer after MSU fired him. Edwards’ son John, who played quarterback for the Grizzlies, said Friday he couldn’t discuss any matters related to O’Day.
As with Pflugrad and O’Day, Kramer was fired after a highly publicized series of legal woes involving football players. After his firing, then-MSU president Geoff Gamble said: “We have this whole suite of criminal activities, but there are academic issues and compliance issues. They all are in the realm of leadership issues.”
Kramer sued, alleging that statement damaged his career and reputation. And, he maintained that UM’s Bobby Hauck, who preceded Pflugrad as Grizzlies head coach, was treated differently by the university system. Hauck was kept on even though several football players were arrested for violent crimes.
Neither Pflugrad nor O’Day has sued — yet. “As a practical matter, we’ve got to provide advice to Robin Pflugrad in terms of what his legal options are,” Datsopoulos said. “We’ve got to wait to see what the university says now as to what their reasons are to terminate him or for relieving him.”
UM needs to clarify the matter of Pflugrad’s contract, he said. The coach’s present three-year contract has a year left, and he’d been promised another three-year contract, Datsopoulos said.
Pflugrad cited that second contract when recruiting coaches and players, he said. “People relied on the fact that they would have jobs for at least three years, and made decisions to relocate their families and change the directions of their own careers,” Datsopoulos said. “The decision to terminate Robin Pflugrad has impacted the lives of many people and I hope that the university administration realized that before they made this precipitous decision.”
At some point, he said, the university will need to negotiate “some type of package that recognizes their legal obligations.”
The reason for Pflugrad’s firing will be part of those negotiations, he said.
“Why didn’t they just advise these people that they wanted to avoid any further fallout and these guys were going to be the people they were going to throw under the bus to avoid that kind of development? Be straightforward about it,” he said.
Which brings things back to why.
A Facebook site called “Demand Answers” asks that same question, as does a Friday editorial in the Montana Kaimin that termed Engstrom’s silence on the matter “damning.”
It may be a while before any reason is forthcoming,” said Matt Thiel of the Thiel Law Office. Once you make a statement, he said, you own it.
“More likely, they will give you a very generic statement that will give them more room to adjust their strategy,” he said, “and buy them time to work on a buyout.”
Lawyer says US blocks investigation of Afghan massacre - Reuters
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
1 of 2. Attorney John Henry Browne (R), civil legal counsel to Joint Base Lewis McChord (JBLM) based soldier Staff Sgt. Robert Bales, the then-deployed U.S. Army soldier accused of murdering 17 Afghan civilians earlier this month, speaks in a press conference in his Seattle, Washington office March 30, 2012.
Credit: Reuters/Anthony BolanteBy Bill RigbySEATTLE | Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:45pm EDT
SEATTLE (Reuters) - The lawyer defending the U.S. soldier accused of murdering 17 Afghan civilians claims U.S. authorities are blocking his ability to investigate the incident.
John Henry Browne, the lawyer for Staff Sergeant Robert Bales, said U.S. forces in Afghanistan have prevented his team from interviewing injured civilians at a hospital in Kandahar, and are allowing other potential witnesses to scatter, making it difficult to track them down.
"When prosecutors don't cooperate, it's because they are concerned about the strength of their case," said Browne at a press conference at his downtown Seattle office on Friday.
Bales was formally charged last week with the murders of eight adults and nine children in a pre-dawn shooting rampage in southern Afghanistan on March 11, which further eroded U.S.-Afghan relations already strained by a decade of war.
He could face the death penalty if convicted.
No date has been set for a trial, but U.S. military prosecutors are putting together their case while Browne is preparing his defense.
Browne said he has a team of investigators in Afghanistan now, but they are receiving little cooperation from military prosecutors who filed the charges.
"We are facing an almost complete information blackout from the government, which is having a devastating effect on our ability to investigate the charges preferred against our client," he said in a statement released earlier on Friday.
A reliable account of the events of the night of the massacre has not yet emerged. A recent report indicated Afghan villagers doubt Bales acted alone. Other reports suggest Bales left his base twice during the night.
"I don't believe that's the case, but we don't know for sure at this point," Browne said on Friday.
Browne said his investigators had spoken to U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan but had not managed to contact any witnesses.
DENIED ACCESS
"When we tried to interview the injured civilians being treated at Kandahar Hospital we were denied access and told to coordinate with the prosecution team," Browne said in the earlier statement.
"The next day the prosecution team interviewed the civilians injured. We found out shortly after the prosecution interviews of the injured civilians that the civilians were all released from the hospital and there was no contact information for them." That means potential witnesses will scatter and could prove unreachable, Browne said.
Prosecutors had not shared their investigative findings with his team, and would not share images captured by a surveillance camera on a blimp above the base which the Army says shows Bales returning to the camp after the alleged shooting, he said.
The next step in the case is for Bales - who is being held at a military detention center at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas - to undergo a mental assessment by Army doctors independent of both the prosecution and defense, to determine if he is fit to stand trial, known as a "sanity board" in the Army.
That could take several months, Browne said.
After that has occurred, the military justice system requires a preliminary hearing, known as an "Article 32" hearing, to establish whether there is a strong enough case to proceed to a court martial.
Browne said it was too early to say whether post-traumatic stress disorder would feature in his defense against the charges. "I don't know whether it will at all," said Browne.
"First thing we have to find out is whether the government has a case. Until we're convinced the government has a case, we're not going to start speculating on what our defenses are going to be."
(Reporting By Bill Rigby; Editing by Todd Eastham and Paul Simao)
Lawyer says US blocks investigation of Afghan massacre
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
SEATTLE (Reuters) - The lawyer defending the U.S. soldier accused of murdering 17 Afghan civilians claims U.S. authorities are blocking his ability to investigate the incident.
AppId is over the quota
SEATTLE (Reuters) - The lawyer defending the U.S. soldier accused of murdering 17 Afghan civilians claims U.S. authorities are blocking his ability to investigate the incident.
John Henry Browne, the lawyer for Staff Sergeant Robert Bales, said U.S. forces in Afghanistan have prevented his team from interviewing injured civilians at a hospital in Kandahar, and are allowing other potential witnesses to scatter, making it difficult to track them down.
"When prosecutors don't cooperate, it's because they are concerned about the strength of their case," said Browne at a press conference at his downtown Seattle office on Friday.
Bales was formally charged last week with the murders of eight adults and nine children in a pre-dawn shooting rampage in southern Afghanistan on March 11, which further eroded U.S.-Afghan relations already strained by a decade of war.
He could face the death penalty if convicted.
No date has been set for a trial, but U.S. military prosecutors are putting together their case while Browne is preparing his defense.
Browne said he has a team of investigators in Afghanistan now, but they are receiving little cooperation from military prosecutors who filed the charges.
"We are facing an almost complete information blackout from the government, which is having a devastating effect on our ability to investigate the charges preferred against our client," he said in a statement released earlier on Friday.
A reliable account of the events of the night of the massacre has not yet emerged. A recent report indicated Afghan villagers doubt Bales acted alone. Other reports suggest Bales left his base twice during the night.
"I don't believe that's the case, but we don't know for sure at this point," Browne said on Friday.
Browne said his investigators had spoken to U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan but had not managed to contact any witnesses.
DENIED ACCESS
"When we tried to interview the injured civilians being treated at Kandahar Hospital we were denied access and told to coordinate with the prosecution team," Browne said in the earlier statement.
"The next day the prosecution team interviewed the civilians i njured. We found out shortly after the prosecution interviews of the injured civilians that the civilians were all released from the hospital and there was no contact information for them." That means potential witnesses will scatter and could prove unreachable, Browne said.
Prosecutors had not shared their investigative findings with his team, and would not share images captured by a surveillance camera on a blimp above the base which the Army says shows Bales returning to the camp after the alleged shooting, he said.
The next step in the case is for Bales - who is being held at a military detention center at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas - to undergo a mental assessment by Army doctors independent of both the prosecution and defense, to determine if he is fit to stand trial, known as a "sanity board" in the Army.
That could take several months, Browne said.
After that has occurred, the military justice system requires a preliminary hearing, known as an "Article 32" hearing, to establish whether there is a strong enough case to proceed to a court martial.
Browne said it was too early to say whether post-traumatic stress disorder would feature in his defense against the charges. "I don't know whether it will at all," said Browne.
"First thing we have to find out is whether the government has a case. Until we're convinced the government has a case, we're not going to start speculating on what our defenses are going to be."
(Reporting By Bill Rigby; Editing by Todd Eastham and Paul Simao)
Bales' lawyer: U.S. is 'hiding evidence' in massacre - Philadelphia Inquirer
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
SEATTLE - The attorney for the U.S. soldier accused of killing 17 Afghan civilians said Friday that the U.S. government was "hiding evidence" from the defense team.
AppId is over the quota
SEATTLE - The attorney for the U.S. soldier accused of killing 17 Afghan civilians said Friday that the U.S. government was "hiding evidence" from the defense team.
John Henry Browne said members of the defense team in Afghanistan were told they would have access to witnesses at a hospital, but later discovered the people had been released.
He also said the U.S. government has not turned over files to the lawyers defending Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales.
The defense team said in a statement the prosecution was withholding information "while potential witnesses scatter."
"It's outrageous," Browne said. "What they are basically doing is hiding evidence. The only reason to hide evidence is if you don't have evidence."
Maj. Chris Ophardt, an Army spokesman, said in a statement that the prosecution would provide Bales' defense with evidence in accordance with court-martial and military rules of evidence. He said that within these guidelines "the prosecution is and has been communicating with the defense."
Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta, after speaking to hundreds of Marines and sailors aboard the USS Peleliu off the coast of San Diego, told reporters: "I've made very clear that those procedures will be followed and that he'll be entitled to whatever information he would be entitled to under the military code of justice."
At a news conference Friday, Browne said the military is not under a legal obligation to provide his team with certain information at this point, but they were led to believe they'd have more assistance.
He said being given access to information at a later date would not work, especially in regards to witnesses in Afghanistan.
"Normally, we have cooperation with prosecutors and we get information, and in this case they actually promised us if we sent people to Afghanistan . . . that they would cooperate," he said.
Browne also said the military planned to conduct a comprehensive mental-health evaluation of Bales at Fort Leavenworth, Kan.
Browne said the military initiated the evaluation and that it would take place within the next two months.
Bales has been charged with 17 counts of premeditated murder.
The lawyer beside Lindsay Lohan - Los Angeles Times
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
When Lindsay Lohan showed up for court on Thursday, the crowd was not as large as it has been for the actress — anticipating perhaps a resolution, rather than the sort of dramatic turn that's made her five-year legal saga as compelling as any TV reality show.
The 25-year-old Lohan has been in and out of jail and rehab so many times, her story line seemed to arc toward failure.
She blew off therapy and community service, ticked off counselors and judges. You never knew what to expect from her in the courtroom — a tearful plea, a pout, a fingernail painted with a vulgar taunt.
But one thing never seemed to change: the steady presence of lawyer Shawn Holley, who is as movie-star pretty as her client but has the gravitas to smooth Lohan's rough edges.
I've been pulling for Lohan from the beginning. She's a talented actress whose on-screen portrayals are an angsty mix of innocence and defiance. Her movies "Mean Girls" and "Freaky Friday" are classic favorites of my daughters.
But talk about bad role-modeling. As a fan, I found Lohan's missteps disappointing. As a mother, I found her jaunts exhausting. She became a symbol of the reckless self-absorption that's become routine for some young women — and I don't just mean Hollywood starlets.
As I watched her legal troubles mount — two DUIs and a jewelry theft — I took an odd sort of comfort from Holley's presence. They seemed to me more than client and lawyer.
When Lohan was sentenced to jail in 2010, she sobbed in the courtroom on Holley's shoulder. When Lohan was handcuffed in 2011, Holley looked down as her client was led out of court, as if the lawyer could not bear to watch.
On Thursday, Holley scribbled notes on her legal pad as the judge complimented Lohan's progress. She allowed herself the slightest smile when the judge pronounced Lohan's probation "terminated."
We witnessed the hug between Lohan and Holley. We didn't get to hear Lohan's whispered "I love you."
::
A few hours after Lohan was freed, I headed off to meet her lawyer. In my 30-minute drive, I heard the story of Lohan's court hearing three times on the radio. She was wearing a "tight-fitting blue pantsuit," one announcer intoned.
She wasn't. It was more like teal, and it was tailored and tasteful — conservative, if you're 25.
It seems we can't resist a dig, even on her most triumphant morning. That reflects our investment in her bad-girl persona. And that troubles Holley.
"Lindsay's incredibly strong, but she's also very fragile," Holley said. "I can't imagine what it must be like to be her and feel how much people are kind of waiting for your downfall. That's got to be difficult, hurtful. And she doesn't deserve it."
That's the celebrity lawyer speaking — but it's also the mother of a 9-year-old daughter, an attorney who got her start as a public defender, a woman who still remembers her own youthful misadventures.
"Let's just say I had fun," said Holley, who went to UCLA from Fairfax High, spent a year teaching English at Washington Prep, then enrolled at Southwestern Law School because she didn't know what to do with her life.
She'd spent lots of time around lawyers. Her mother — who was single and 19 when Holley was born — was a legal secretary who earned her MBA in night school and spent years managing law firms.
Holley got her legal start interviewing car thieves and crack addicts. "You walk into this [courtroom] holding tank, and it's hot and it stinks and it's nasty," she said. And no one understands their legal rights. Most were ready to plead guilty, she said, even if they had a legitimate defense.
"You start seeing that you're dealing with the concept of liberty in real life."
Lawyer cites PTSD to defend US soldier in Afghan killings
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
The lawyer for a US soldier charged with killing 17 villagers in southern Afghanistan said Wednesday he will cite Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) to defend the serviceman.
AppId is over the quota
The lawyer for a US soldier charged with killing 17 villagers in southern Afghanistan said Wednesday he will cite Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) to defend the serviceman.
Attorney John Henry Browne added that prosecutors will have trouble proving their case against Staff Sergeant Robert Bales, whose alleged attack further strained already tense ties between Washington and Kabul.
Bales, 38, is said to have walked out of his base in the southern province of Kandahar in the early hours of March 11 and mounted a massacre in two nearby villages, with many of his victims women and children.
"When the experts are done with this case, there'll definitely be PTSD... I know a lot about PTSD and the symptoms and everything, and I'm convinced from my conversations that PTSD will be an issue," he told CNN.
The lawyer, who said he has met his client for 11 hours, downplayed reports that Bales had confessed, or even spoken about the shootings when he returned from the alleged attacks in the early hours.
"I don't know that I trust anything about him saying 'I shot people,' because I have not heard that from any source I trust," Browne told CNN in an interview.
Bales, who is being held at the Fort Leavenworth military base in Kansas, has been charged with 17 counts of premeditated murder, as well as six counts of assault and attempted murder in connection with the massacre.
Browne claimed there was a lack of evidence from the scene.
"It's not a traditional crime scene. There is no crime scene. The military has not even been back to the villages where this allegation stems from. They haven't been back there," Browne said.
"So there's no crime scene, there's no DNA, there's no fingerprints, there's no confession. It's -- you know, the Afghan people traditionally, I understand, and understandably, bury their dead very quickly.
"So it's going to be a tough case for the prosecutors," he added.
The killings have put further strain on the already difficult relationship between Kabul and Washington, after the burning of Korans by American soldiers in mid-February triggered deadly anti-US protests.
US soldier's lawyer slams Afghan killings 'blackout'
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
The lawyer representing a US soldier accused of killing 17 Afghan villagers condemned what he called an "information blackout" that prevents him from preparing his defense case.
AppId is over the quota
The lawyer representing a US soldier accused of killing 17 Afghan villagers condemned what he called an "information blackout" that prevents him from preparing his defense case.
Attorney John Henry Browne on Friday said his team had been blocked from interviewing witnesses and injured civilians in southern Afghanistan following the alleged massacre earlier this month.
"We were expecting a lot more cooperation. The prosecutors in this case promised us a lot of cooperation which we're just not getting," he told reporters in Seattle.
"We are facing an almost complete information blackout from the government, which is having a devastating effect on our ability to investigate the charges preferred against our client," he added in a statement.
His client Sergeant Robert Bales, 38, is said to have walked out of his base in the southern province of Kandahar in the early hours of March 11 and mounted a massacre in two nearby villages, with many of his victims women and children.
Browne met his client earlier this month at the Fort Leavenworth military base in Kansas, where Bales is detained charged with 17 counts of premeditated murder, as well as six counts of assault and attempted murder.
But his team has made little progress on the ground in Afghanistan. "When we tried to interview the injured civilians being treated at Kandahar Hospital, we were denied access and told to coordinate with the prosecution team," it said.
The next day, prosecutors interviewed the injured civilians, but Browne's office found out shortly afterward that "the civilians were all released from the hospital and there was no contact information for them.
"In addition, we are being denied access to the injured civilians medical records that are in the possession of the government which makes it even more impossible for us to try to locate and interview these crucial witnesses," it said.
"The prosecution is withholding the entire investigative file from the defense team while the potential witnesses scatter into unknown and potentially inaccessible areas in Afghanistan."
Browne, who said his team had also not been shown an alleged video of Bales, conceded that under military trial rules, they do not have the right to shared "discovery" information until 30 days before a so-called Article 32 preliminary hearing.
"In this case, they actually promised us that if we sent people to Afghanistan... they would cooperate, and make witnesses available for us. And they've obviously violated that promise," he said.
He also warned that the defense -- which will have access to the results of a "sanity review" of Bales expected in the next two months and not made officially available to prosecutors -- could withhold cooperation.
"If they want cooperation from us they better start cooperating more," he told reporters.
Browne said earlier this week that post-traumatic stress disorder will almost certainly be part of his defense, adding that prosecutors will have trouble proving their case against Bales.
The killings have further strained the already difficult relationship between Kabul and Washington, at an all-time low after the burning of Korans by Americans, a spate of deadly anti-US protests and an earlier video showing US Marines urinating on the corpses of Taliban militants.
US military officials declined to respond directly to Browne's allegations. But army spokesman George Wright told AFP: "The US Army will continue to work with the Bales legal defense team in the months to come."
Lawyer: Afghan suspect had depression after Iraq
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — The U.S. soldier accused of killing 17 Afghan civilians suffered a traumatic incident during his second tour in Iraq that triggered "tremendous depression," his lawyer said Wednesday.
AppId is over the quota
OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — The U.S. soldier accused of killing 17 Afghan civilians suffered a traumatic incident during his second tour in Iraq that triggered "tremendous depression," his lawyer said Wednesday.
Lawyer John Henry Browne said he could not discuss the details of the matter because it remains classified. But he expects the issue to become a focal point in the case against Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales.
"It caused him tremendous depression and anxiety," Browne said.
The lawyer previously said Bales experienced other major dangers in his deployments, including a serious foot injury and head trauma. In addition, a fellow soldier's leg had been blown off days before the Afghanistan massacre, he said.
Bales was charged with 17 counts of premeditated murder and other crimes. He is being held at a U.S. military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kan.
A defense team is now in Afghanistan to collect evidence and interview other U.S. soldiers who knew Bales.
"Everyone they've spoken to in the military has nothing but amazingly positive things to say about him," said Browne, who is not part of the team in Afghanistan.
Due to security concerns, Browne doesn't think the team will visit the villages where the killings occurred. The investigators are likely to stay in Afghanistan a few more weeks.
Browne questioned the U.S. government's case against Bales, noting there is no preserved crime scene to assess.
"It's going to be a difficult case for the prosecution to prove," Browne said. "There's no 'CSI' information. There's no DNA that I know of. There's no ballistics that I know of."
Bales has indicated that he had no recollection of prescription drugs he may have been taking before the shooting — something the attorney took as an indicator of larger memory problems.
The lawyer also said his client has a sketchy memory of the night of the shootings. In a separate interview with The Washington Post, Browne said Wednesday that Bales remembered the smell of gunfire and of human bodies but not much more.
Browne added his client reported suffering from nightmares, flashbacks of war scenes and persistent headaches after his multiple combat tours. Bales told his legal team that he has long woken up with night sweats and often replays memories of a grisly scene in Iraq that he and his infantry company witnessed several years ago, Browne said.
The lawyer stressed that Bales did not confess and seemed surprised when his weapon was taken away, the newspaper reported.
U.S. military officials said Bales was drinking on a southern Afghanistan base on March 11 before creeping away to two villages at night, shooting his victims and setting many of them on fire. Nine were children.
Bales has had incidents involving alcohol and violence in the past.
In 2002, He was arrested for a drunken assault of a security guard at a Tacoma casino. That charge was dismissed after Bales completed 20 hours of anger management training.
In 2008, a couple accused an intoxicated Bales of grabbing a woman's hand and thrusting it toward his crotch before kicking and punching the woman's boyfriend, according to a police report. Prosecutors declined to pursue that case.
___
Associated Press writer Mike Baker can be reached at http://twitter.com/MikeBakerAP
ABS trailblazers revealed
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Wednesday 28 March 2012 by John Hyde
AppId is over the quota
Wednesday 28 March 2012 by John Hyde The Solicitors Regulation Authority today announced the identities of the first three alternative business structures.
The Co-operative Legal Services, John Welch & Stammers and Lawbridge Solicitors are the first to have their applications approved. They can now provide reserved legal activities while owned and managed by non-lawyers, under the terms of the Legal Services Act.
The SRA has spent almost three months processing more than 180 applications from a range of businesses.
Co-op Legal Services, set up in 2006, employs 400 staff and has plans to add a further 150 this year. ABS status will allow it to diversify into family law later this year, to complement services in personal injury claims, will writing, probate, conveyancing and employment law.
Operating in Witney, Oxfordshire, since 1932, John Welch & Stammers has seven fee earners and 11 support staff.
Practice manager Bernadette Summers will now be appointed as a non-lawyer managing partner to join two existing solicitor partners.
Lawbridge Solicitors, based in Sidcup, Kent, has one solicitor, Michael Pope, who will now be joined in the shareholding by his wife Alison, practice manager.
SRA chief executive Antony Townsend said the announcement is a culmination of two years’ work: ‘By stimulating competition and encouraging innovation, we should see consumers’ experiences enjoy a major boost.
‘Some people may be surprised that there are two high street practices with a handful of staff among the first wave of ABS organisations that we’ve authorised. But we’ve always said that ABS offers options for all firms.’
Justice minister Jonathan Djanogly said customers will find legal services ‘more accessible’ and the service ‘more competitive and efficient’.
Djanogly added: 'Our UK legal services are unrivalled around the world and these changes will allow them to reach new heights, as solicitors’ firms develop new markets, seek external investment and join up with other businesses to offer different products to consumers and provide opportunities for growth.'
The Law Society has congratulated all three practices on being the first to receive the ABS licence and said the trio all reflect the opportunities that non-lawyer ownership can offer.
John Wotton, president of the Law Society, said: 'The Co-operative Group is a well-known brand on the high street, with a substantial profile and a strong reputation for ethical business.
'I’d like to welcome Co-operative Legal Services into the Law Society fold. Lawbridge Solicitors and John Welch & Stammers are existing law firms who have taken an innovative step in adopting new ownership structures.’
He added that the latest development would introduce new ways of working and increase choice for consumers and corporate clients.
David Edmonds, chair of the Legal Services Board, stressed that while regulation has a part to play in the new era, it must not restrict growth.
'Breaking down barriers to entry and freeing the ways in which firm can operate is key. But the change and innovation has to be provider-led. We will be working to make sure that regulation does not create inappropriate barriers and targets risk. Supervision must be proportionate.’
Lawyer: French arrests misdirected
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Mohammed Merah killed seven people in a series of attacks.NEW: Lawyer: The Forsane Alizza group wants to protect the rights of Muslims in FranceThe Islamist group's leader says it had no contact with gunman Merah, his lawyer says19 suspected members of the Forsane Alizza group were arrested Friday, authorities saidPolice have been investigating whether Merah, blamed for 7 deaths, acted alone
updated 9:12 AM EDT, Fri March 23, 2012 
Did French intelligence services miss vital clues as Mohammed Merah showed signs of growing radicalization? updated 12:11 PM EDT, Thu March 22, 2012 
The Toulouse shootings refocus fears on trained attackers who are determined, living legally in the West and operating alone.updated 7:38 AM EDT, Thu March 22, 2012 
'Lone wolves' who plot to carry out small-scale attacks on soft targets could be the future of terrorism, a security expert warns.updated 10:32 AM EDT, Fri March 23, 2012 
Mohammed Merah, described as a self-styled al Qaeda jihadist, was named as the chief suspect in a series of deadly shootings.updated 12:08 PM EDT, Thu March 22, 2012 
CNN examines whether the handling of the crisis will have a bearing on the presidential poll.updated 6:30 PM EDT, Tue March 20, 2012 
In the pink-hued streets of Toulouse, France's "Ville Rose," flags are flying at half-mast: The city is in mourning -- and shock. updated 12:08 AM EDT, Tue March 20, 2012 
The city of Toulouse is at the highest security alert level, after a teacher and three children were gunned down at a Jewish school.updated 7:51 PM EDT, Mon March 19, 2012 
Agnes Poirier, a political commentator, talks about the disbelief in France after the deadly drive-by shooting at a school in Toulouse.updated 6:06 AM EDT, Thu March 22, 2012 
Out of nowhere a gunman appeared in the courtyard of a Jewish school in the French city just as students were arriving for morning classes.Most popular stories right now
AppId is over the quota
Mohammed Merah killed seven people in a series of attacks.NEW: Lawyer: The Forsane Alizza group wants to protect the rights of Muslims in FranceThe Islamist group's leader says it had no contact with gunman Merah, his lawyer says19 suspected members of the Forsane Alizza group were arrested Friday, authorities saidPolice have been investigating whether Merah, blamed for 7 deaths, acted aloneParis (CNN) -- The leader of an Islamist group whose members were targeted in a series of French police raids denies any contact with Toulouse gunman Mohammed Merah, lawyer Philippe Missamou said Saturday.
The leader of the Forsane Alizza group, Mohammed Achamlane, was among 19 people arrested Friday over alleged connections to radical Islam, Missamou said.The raids came a week after Merah, who killed seven people in a series of attacks, was shot dead after a long siege in the southwestern city of Toulouse.French media reports suggested Merah had developed connections with the pro-al Qaeda group, which has a cluster of followers in Toulouse.Forsane Alizza was outlawed in January for encouraging French citizens to travel to Afghanistan to fight jihad.Missamou told CNN he had last spoken to Achamlane on Monday.At this time, Achamlane told him that the group had not had contact with Merah, and that it had nothing to do with Merah's killings in Toulouse, Missamou said.Achamlane said the group did not support armed combat, the attorney said.Missamou expects to be allowed to meet with members of the group, which he has represented since January, on Monday or Tuesday.After that they will be put before a judge and either placed under further examination with charges pending, or released, he said.Missamou disputed the Interior Ministry's claim that all 19 people arrested are members of Forsane Alizza, saying several were not.Friday's arrests took place in Toulouse, Marseille, Nantes, Lyon and the Ile de France region, around Paris, the Interior Ministry said.The ministry's media office said "the police had plans to carry out 19 arrests, and therefore 19 arrests were made in connection with the group Forsane Alizza."Interior Minister Claude Gueant said that several firearms, including five rifles, four automatic weapons and three Kalashnikovs, had been found in searches of the suspects' homes, as well as a bulletproof vest.Missamou said he had no information on the claims that firearms were found.He also said he did not know know whether members of the group have spent time in Pakistan or Afghanistan.The lawyer disputes the characterization of the group as dangerous, saying it works to contest perceived injustice on the part of the French state.Its members claim that France does not recognize the multi-cultural, multi-racial and multi-religious nature of the country, and passes laws which target Muslims in France, he said.Police have been investigating whether Merah acted alone in planning his attacks.He is blamed for the killings of three French paratroopers, a rabbi and three Jewish children ages 4, 5 and 7. Two other people were seriously wounded in the shootings.Merah told police he had attended an al Qaeda training camp while visiting Afghanistan and Pakistan, according to Paris prosecutor Francois Molins.But his uncle, Jamal Azizi, denied statements by French authorities that Merah was an al Qaeda sympathizer and that he had traveled to Afghanistan or Pakistan to train to use arms.Merah was buried Thursday at a cemetery outside Toulouse.CNN's Anna Prichard contributed to this report.updated 9:12 AM EDT, Fri March 23, 2012 Did French intelligence services miss vital clues as Mohammed Merah showed signs of growing radicalization? updated 12:11 PM EDT, Thu March 22, 2012 The Toulouse shootings refocus fears on trained attackers who are determined, living legally in the West and operating alone.updated 7:38 AM EDT, Thu March 22, 2012 'Lone wolves' who plot to carry out small-scale attacks on soft targets could be the future of terrorism, a security expert warns.updated 10:32 AM EDT, Fri March 23, 2012 Mohammed Merah, described as a self-styled al Qaeda jihadist, was named as the chief suspect in a series of deadly shootings.updated 12:08 PM EDT, Thu March 22, 2012 CNN examines whether the handling of the crisis will have a bearing on the presidential poll.updated 6:30 PM EDT, Tue March 20, 2012 In the pink-hued streets of Toulouse, France's "Ville Rose," flags are flying at half-mast: The city is in mourning -- and shock. updated 12:08 AM EDT, Tue March 20, 2012 The city of Toulouse is at the highest security alert level, after a teacher and three children were gunned down at a Jewish school.updated 7:51 PM EDT, Mon March 19, 2012 Agnes Poirier, a political commentator, talks about the disbelief in France after the deadly drive-by shooting at a school in Toulouse.updated 6:06 AM EDT, Thu March 22, 2012 Out of nowhere a gunman appeared in the courtyard of a Jewish school in the French city just as students were arriving for morning classes.Most popular stories right nowSupreme Court rejects damage claim in HIV privacy case
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
The Supreme Court limits "actual damages" under the Privacy ActA California man sued when the government publicly revealed his HIV statusThe 5-3 ruling pitted the court's conservative majority against the liberal minorityJustice Elena Kagan, the former solicitor general, did not participate
AppId is over the quota
The Supreme Court limits "actual damages" under the Privacy ActA California man sued when the government publicly revealed his HIV statusThe 5-3 ruling pitted the court's conservative majority against the liberal minorityJustice Elena Kagan, the former solicitor general, did not participate
Washington (CNN) -- A divided Supreme Court ruled Wednesday against a California pilot who sued after the federal government publicly revealed his HIV status.
In a 5-3 ruling, the high court decided Stanmore Cooper's claims of mental and emotional distress are not covered under the Privacy Act."The Privacy Act does not unequivocally authorize damages for mental or emotional distress and therefore does not waive the government's sovereign immunity for such harms," Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the conservative majority.Three liberal justices dissented, while a fourth, former Solicitor General Elena Kagan, did not participate.In a statement Wednesday, Cooper said it was "discouraging that a majority of the court sided with the government."Cooper became a licensed recreational pilot in 1964, but two decades later, the San Francisco man was diagnosed with HIV. As his condition worsened, he let his private pilot's certificate and his airman medical certificate lapse.In 1996, Cooper applied for long-term disability with the Social Security Administration."I was in bad shape, I didn't have long to live," he said last year. But his health improved thanks to a cocktail of anti-retroviral therapy. He went back to work and wanted to fly again."I found out they were issuing medicals (exemptions) and I reapplied" to the Federal Aviation Administration "without revealing my HIV status," he said. "Big mistake."He received his new pilot's certificate but, unknown to him, a joint local-federal initiative called Operation Safe Pilot was launched in 2002. Using a spreadsheet, the agencies shared and compared the names and personal data of about 45,000 pilots in Northern California, looking for potentially medically unfit individuals who were also receiving federal benefits.Cooper was among four dozen or so pilots tagged as a "person of interest." When confronted by government agents, he admitted to a misdemeanor charge of filing a false report.He was sentenced to probation and fined, and his pilot's certificate was revoked. The retired business executive's name was listed in a federal press release and later, through his prosecution, Cooper's medical history suddenly was a matter of public record."I had been able to control those (with) whom I shared my information about my HIV status, limited to some co-workers, family, and close friends," he said "And suddenly that was out of my control."Cooper, who was eventually allowed to fly again, sued."I chose not to reveal my HIV infection and that was a very bad thing," he said. "I took responsibility for it and I paid the price. I was punished. And I think now it's the government's turn to own up to breaking the law and take responsibility for what they did."A federal judge found both the FAA and the Social Security Administration violated the Privacy Act with the information-sharing investigation, but said under the law, only "actual damages" could be collected by plaintiffs seeking redress.Since Cooper made no claims for economic harm, such as lost wages or medical expenses, he was out of luck. The judge found "emotional injury" alone did not qualify and dismissed the lawsuit.A federal appeals court reversed that decision, ruling for Cooper. The FAA then asked the high court to intervene.During an hour of oral arguments last year, the justices stayed away from the specific claims of emotional harm made by Cooper, focusing instead on what the law says about qualifying for damages."The argument you have made -- and I certainly understand it, that this is the Privacy Act and so it's precisely these types of damages that you would be concerned about -- really cuts both ways," Chief Justice John Roberts said to Cooper's lawyer."What you are saying is this (law) covers a really big chunk of damages, because this is what the whole act was about," Roberts said. "And it seems to me that argument suggests that there is some weight to the government's point: That if you are going to get that, you really do need clearer" language in the law that would immunize the government to some extent, from a flood of hard-to-disprove lawsuits.The ambiguity has divided lower courts for years, and privacy experts said the ease with which the government can collect and share information in the digital age makes the issue of personal privacy liability ripe for review.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg repeatedly hammered away at the government lawyer arguing for the FAA. She said the federal damages provision in question is similar to state tort claims that include both emotional and financial harm."The person who is subject to this, to this embarrassment, this humiliation, doesn't have out-of-pocket costs, but is terribly distressed, nervous, anxious, and all the rest," Ginsburg said. "The act that the Congress is reaching, the impact is of that nature. I mean, pecuniary (monetary) damages ordinarily attend conduct that embarrasses, humiliates you, causes mental distress."Eric Feigin of the Justice Department said the Privacy Act's language may be interpreted as allowing damages for such things as "humiliation, embarrassment and mental anguish," but said because the phrase "actual" damages remains vague, the government should get the benefit of the doubt, tipping the case in its favor."Simply because a plaintiff may have suffered an adverse effect" from the privacy violation, argued Feigin, "doesn't mean that the plaintiff suffered actual damages."Raymond Cardozo, Cooper's lawyer, pointed out during the hearing that his client's information was made public and his name and HIV status are still posted on a federal government database. He also made a larger argument, that his client's dilemma is one that may affect all Americans."Congress passed this act to restore the citizens' faith in their government, and it made a solemn promise to the American citizens that in cases of intentional and willful violation, the United States shall be liable for actual damages," Cardozo said. "Today, the government is proposing that "actual damages" be read in a way that renders this act virtually irrelevant. That makes a mockery of that solemn promise."Cooper attended the public session at the court and expressed optimism afterward he would prevail."They've betrayed my trust and I can't get that back," Cooper said at the time. "There was nothing to lose here. I had to do it. It was the right thing to do."The case is Cooper v. FAA (10-1024).CNN's Tom Cohen and Kate Bolduan contribute to this report.Bahrain lawyer: Leading activist could face trial
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
MANAMA, Bahrain (AP) — A lawyer for a leading Bahrain rights activist says his client could face possible trial on charges of taking part in anti-government protests in the Gulf kingdom.
AppId is over the quota
MANAMA, Bahrain (AP) — A lawyer for a leading Bahrain rights activist says his client could face possible trial on charges of taking part in anti-government protests in the Gulf kingdom.
Lawyer Mohammed al-Jishi says activist Nabeel Rajab was released early Sunday after hours of interrogation. Al-Jishi says the next step may be a trial for Rajab, the president of the Bahrain Center for Human Rights.
Rajab has been an outspoken critic of crackdowns against Bahrain's Shiite majority, which began an uprising in February 2011 seeking to end the Sunni monarchy's near monopoly on power.
A police statement Saturday said Rajab was detained on charges linked to "illegal" demonstrations and the case was referred to the public prosecutor.
Trayvon lawyers want probe in prosecutor's role - Toronto Sun
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Report an error
AppId is over the quota
Report an error
Attorneys for the family of slain black teenager Trayvon Martin are asking the U.S. Justice Department to review reports that prosecutors undermined a police investigation of shooter George Zimmerman by overruling a detective who wanted to charge him.
The Justice Department’s civil rights division had already agreed to review the local Florida investigation into the racially charged case that has riveted the country. Waves of demonstrations have called for Zimmerman’s arrest.
Lawyers for Martin’s family are preparing a formal request that the federal government also investigate the specific report that state attorney prosecutors interfered with a homicide detective who wanted to charge Zimmerman with manslaughter.
“We are asking the Justice Department to investigate that,” attorney Benjamin Crump, who has been retained by the Martin family as it pressures authorities to arrest Zimmerman, told Reuters late Saturday. “We are concerned about interference in the investigation.”
Zimmerman, 28, who is half white and half Hispanic, was a neighborhood watch captain who shot dead the 17-year-old in a gated community on Feb. 26 after following him upon considering him suspicious.
Zimmerman has disappeared from public view but his father and brother have come to his defense in media interviews, saying Martin attacked Zimmerman and Zimmerman feared for his life when he shot the unarmed teen.
Police declined to arrest him, citing Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law, which permits citizens to use deadly force when they feel threatened with death or great bodily harm.
Sanford police detective Chris Serino, unconvinced by Zimmerman’s story of self-defense, wanted to charge him with manslaughter but was overruled by the office of State Attorney Norm Wolfinger, the prosecutor whose district includes the city of Sanford, ABC News reported on Tuesday.
Wolfinger has declined all comment since removing himself from the case on March 22. Governor Rick Scott named a special prosecutor, Angela Corey, to replace Wolfinger on the Trayvon Martin investigation. Corey has yet to say if she intends to charge Zimmerman, who remains free but in hiding.
A law enforcement source who has been informed by Sanford police investigators told Reuters that Serino was eager to make a case but encountered resistance from the prosecutor.
“Chris would have made a recommendation for manslaughter but Norm Wolfinger’s office wanted it to be a slam dunk,” the source said. “They don’t want to hear that this is wrong or that is wrong with the case. That’s the way this county does business.”
A separate report by TheGrio.com, unconfirmed by Reuters, said Wolfinger left his home the Sunday night of the shooting to meet with Sanford police in person.
“Why did he get out of his bed and go to the police station that night and overrule the lead investigator?” Crump said. “It doesn’t fit well.”
Crump said Justice Department lawyers investigating the case invited him to provide relevant updates, and that his team would forward its request soon.
Federal authorities could step into the case if they believe the state investigation is lacking, and the Justice Department periodically takes an interest in matters where there is a potential civil rights violation.
Egypt army pardons Brotherhood presidency nominee: lawyer - Reuters India
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Muslim Brotherhood's Mohammad Khairat al-Shater, walks into the courtroom in Cairo, Egypt, January 30, 2007.
Credit: Reuters/Nasser Nuri/FilesBy Marwa AwadCAIRO | Sun Apr 1, 2012 10:46pm IST
CAIRO (Reuters) - Egypt's military has dropped two court convictions against the Muslim Brotherhood's new presidential candidate Khairat al-Shater, clearing him to run in the elections to replace ousted leader Hosni Mubarak, the movement's lawyer said on Sunday.
In a policy reversal on Saturday, the Brotherhood opted to field a candidate to contest the votes in May and June and named Shater, a wealthy businessman, as its choice after deciding the other candidates were not worthy of its support.
Shater, 61, was tried in a military court in 1995 and sentenced to five years in jail on charges of "reviving" the Brotherhood. He was also tried and convicted in 2007 on charges of providing university students with arms and training.
He was jailed for seven years in the 2007 case but was freed with many other Brotherhood members in 2011 after serving four and a half years of the sentence.
Under Egyptian law, former convicts cannot occupy official posts.
"All charges and cases against engineer Khairat al-Shater have been dropped," the Brotherhood's lawyer Abdel Moneim Abdel Maqsood told Reuters.
"Shater now has all the civil rights he was deprived of and can now exercise his political rights including running for an official post in the country," he said.
The military would not confirm this but one army source said the Brotherhood would not publicly name any candidate of its own without prior clearance from the ruling military council.
Abdel Maqsood said he had picked up presidential application papers on Shater's behalf from the electoral committee.
Mubarak's overthrow in February last year ended the Brotherhood's official exclusion from politics. Before that, its leaders were often rounded up by state security in what human rights groups said was a deliberate policy to curb their political reach.
The Brotherhood did not begin the protests that toppled Mubarak but has been their most obvious beneficiary, capitalising on a formidable grass-roots campaign machine to secure top spot in a recent parliamentary vote.
That puts Shater among the frontrunners in a race billed as Egypt's first free and fair election in six decades, even though others have months of unofficial canvassing under their belts.
Analysts said the decision to field a presidential candidate suggested the Brotherhood, now on the brink of power for the first time in its 84-year history, was worried it could have its newfound influence snatched away.
Shater's candidacy is likely to split the Islamist vote in the elections further. There are three other Islamist candidates running.
But liberals may still fret over Shater's bid as it signals the rising influence of Islamists after they swept parliament and now dominate an assembly writing a new constitution.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Sunday while visiting Istanbul that the United States will be watching Egypt's political process, urging political actors not to discriminate against minorities.
Many Coptic Christians, who represent around 10 percent of Egypt's population of over 80 million, have voiced concern over the rise of groups pledged to a stricter application of Islamic Sharia law.
(Editing by Tom Pfeiffer and David Stamp)
Two Firm Injury Lawyers Recognized as Top 40 Under 40 Trial Lawyers in Virginia - PR Web (press release)
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Virginia Beach, VA (PRWEB) March 30, 2012
AppId is over the quota
Virginia Beach, VA (PRWEB) March 30, 2012
The National Trial Lawyers has selected Virginia injury attorneys Emily Mapp Brannon and Kevin Duffan, associates with the Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton law firm, for inclusion in “Top 40 under 40″ trial lawyers in Virginia.
The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 is a professional organization comprised of America’s top young trial attorneys. Membership into the Top 40 Under 40 association is by invitation only and is limited to lawyers under the age of 40 who are chosen by a comprehensive selection process that includes peer nominations and third-party research. Those lawyers selected have excelled in the court room, possess superior qualifications, and have displayed leadership as young trial lawyers.
Basically, this means Emily and Kevin are some of the best personal injury lawyers in Virginia under the age of 40.
Our Virginia personal injury law firm is proud that Emily and Kevin were selected for this prestigious honor. They represent our firm’s commitment to excellence and willingness to advocate our client’s rights from the initial pleading all the way to a jury trial, when necessary.
Emily and Kevin’s achievement comes on the heels of the firm being selected as one of the best injury law firms in Virginia for 2011-2012 by U.S. News & World Report.
Lawyer: Islamic group not linked to gunman
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Published: March. 31, 2012 at 6:50 PM
AppId is over the quota
Published: March. 31, 2012 at 6:50 PM
PARIS, March 31 (UPI) -- The lawyer for the leader of an Islamic group arrested by French authorities said the group has no connection with the Toulouse gunman who killed seven people.
Lawyer Philippe Missamou, who represents Forsane Alizza leader Mohammed Achamlane, one of 19 people arrested Friday for alleged links to radical Islam, said Saturday Achamlane denied the group had anything to do with Mohammed Merah's killings, CNN reported.
Merah killed a rabbi, the cleric's two children and another schoolgirl outside a Jewish school last week and three paratroopers of north African descent the week before.
Merah allegedly admitted to the shootings during a two-day standoff with police at his apartment in Toulouse before he was killed in an exchange of gunfire.
CNN said French media reports have suggested Merah had links to Forsane Alizza, which has followers in Toulouse.
France's Interior Ministry said "19 arrests were made in connection with the group Forsane Alizza" Friday in Toulouse, Marseille, Nantes, Lyon and the Ile de France region, around Paris.
Interior Minister Claude Gueant said five rifles, four automatic weapons, three Kalashnikov rifles and a bulletproof vest were found in searches of the suspects' homes.
Missamou said Achamlane said Forsane Alizza did not support armed combat. The lawyer said the group was not dangerous but worked to battle injustice against Muslims in France.
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Lawyer Says Zuccotti Park Demonstrators Broke No Law - New York Times (blog)
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Robert Stolarik for The New York TimesPolice officers in Zuccotti Park, on Nov. 15, 2011 where they removed tents and arrested Occupy Wall Street protesters.
AppId is over the quota
Robert Stolarik for The New York TimesPolice officers in Zuccotti Park, on Nov. 15, 2011 where they removed tents and arrested Occupy Wall Street protesters.When hundreds of police officers entered Zuccotti Park early on Nov. 15, they dismantled tents and other structures that had been erected by
The police also arrested dozens of protesters who refused to leave the park, charging them with offenses that included trespassing and disorderly conduct, as officers set up metal barricades around the park’s perimeter.
On Friday, a defense lawyer argued in Criminal Court in
While it might be appropriate for Brookfield to establish rules governing behavior in the park, the lawyer said, the company could not order people out of the park, because an agreement with the city required it to be open to the public 24 hours a day.
“Brookfield lacked the authority to exclude people,” the lawyer, Jethro M. Eisenstein, argued in support of a motion to dismiss the charges, contending that it was “unseemly and unjust to allow Brookfield to harness the power of the state” to clear the park of protesters.
But an assistant district attorney told Judge Matthew A. Sciarrino Jr. that the company was within its rights to revoke permission for protesters to be in the park while the police and sanitation workers removed banned structures.
“They have to have the ability to enforce rules,” the prosecutor, Ryan Hayward, said. “They did deem it necessary to close that park.”
Judge Sciarrino asked both sides to clarify certain points. He asked Mr. Eisenstein if he thought the rules allowed people to use Zuccotti Park for any purpose. Later, he told Mr. Hayward that experience had taught him that sometimes, “the law is not simply what the city says it is.”
At the heart of the arguments is the issue of what authority and responsibilities Brookfield has in managing Zuccotti Park, a half-acre granite expanse in the financial district that the Occupy protesters turned into a headquarters in mid-September. The park was created under an agreement that allowed developers of a skyscraper across Liberty Street to build 500,000 extra square feet of office space.
In return, the developers created a public space that would be open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
According to papers filed by Mr. Eisenstein and the
The district attorney’s office, along with the city’s Law Department, disagreed, writing that “Brookfield Properties was faced with a situation where the volume of tenting, structures, sleeping bags, pillows, clothes, trash and other personal property had created a safety condition,” and that the only effective remedy involved clearing people from the park.
At one point, Judge Sciarrino asked Mr. Hayward if he agreed that there was a distinction between rules of conduct and rules of access. Mr. Hayward replied that he did and that in order “to ensure compliance with rules of conduct that temporary closure needed to be effectuated.”
Mr. Eisenstein countered that the closure could not accurately be termed temporary because metal barricades surrounded the park for nearly two months after Nov. 15, and that people entering during that time were subject to searches by private security guards.
Judge Sciarrino did not rule immediately on the motion.
Rodman's Lawyer: He's No 'Deadbeat'
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Dennis Rodman's lawyer said Wednesday that the retired NBA player is not a "deadbeat dad," following court papers filed Tuesday that claimed Rodman owes more than $800,000 in child support.
"The way that it's being painted makes it sound like he's in horrible shape," Rodman's lawyer, Linnea Willis, told ABCNews.com. "This makes him sound like he's a deadbeat dead. The bottom line here is that Dennis Rodman has always paid child support to the best of his ability and will continue to do so."
On Tuesday, a lawyer for Rodman's ex-wife, Michelle Rodman, filed papers in a Los Angeles court claiming Rodman owed more than $800,000 in back child support for the couple's 9- and 10-year-old children as of March 1st. He was previously ordered to pay his ex-wife $50,000 per month for child support. In response, Willis filed a motion to counter the $50,000 per month order.
She said that order was issued in 2010 "without consideration of Dennis' actual income, but rather was based on an exaggerated income amount made up by his ex-wife's attorneys." She also said that Rodman was not properly served legal papers.
Rodman's manager, Darren Prince, said Rodman has been paying "at least $4,000 or $5,000" to his ex-wife each month. Willis said the court "didn't have evidence about all the payments that were made."
"The only thing that was at issue was for certain months that her attorney brought up, he did pay something but it wasn't enough," Willis said.
A sentencing hearing for Rodman has been set for May 29. While his ex-wife's attorney said Rodman faces jail time for his inability to pay child and spousal support, Willis said the judge "made it very clear he's not going to give him jail time."
Michelle Rodman's lawyer, Jack Kayajanian, did not respond to ABCNews.com's requests for comment.
Willis also clarified Rodman's condition. Tuesday's court papers described the former Chicago Bulls rebound star as "extremely sick."
"The way that it's being painted makes it sound like he's in horrible shape, he's not," she said. "He plays, he plays in China, he makes appearances."
On Tuesday, Prince, Rodman's manager, told ABCNews.com that Rodman has been sidelined by his "well-documented drinking problem." Willis insisted that despite his setbacks, Rodman remains on good terms with his ex-wife and children.
"Whenever he sees the kids and whenever they're here, they talk," she said. "He loves her still. On their end, it's not contentious."
Dennis Rodman and Michelle Rodman married in 2003 after dating for four years. Michelle Rodman filed for divorce in 2004, but their marriage was not officially dissolved until earlier this year because of attempts at reconciliation.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)